Axioms of the Real Numbers Explainer

3 comments

  1. Those axioms listed are not the real number axioms, but the field axioms (except that you forgot to exclude 0 when stating the existence of a multiplicative inverse). Now the real numbers do form a field, and therefore the field axioms are an important part of the real number axioms. But there are also fields that do not at all resemble the real numbers, e.g. fields where 1+1=0. To get the real numbers, you need more than just the field axioms.

    The first thing you have to add are the order axioms, and the axioms that state the compatibility between arithmetic operations and order. By doing so, you arrive at the axioms of ordered fields, and that brings you already much closer to the real numbers. In particular, every ordered field contains a subfield isomorphic to the rational numbers.

    However the rational numbers themselves already form an ordered field, and clearly there are real numbers that are not rational, so there’s still something missing. And that something is the completeness of the real numbers.

    Fortunately if you also add completeness, you then indeed have the axioms of the real numbers, as the real numbers are, up to isomorphism, the only complete ordered field.

    But the nine axioms from your post definitely are not all of the real number axioms.

    Like

Leave a comment